རྒྱའུ་པ་ཟལ་བ་ལ་འབའཐ/....༧
Fam
which flow out. have there to do with people for whom one
of a our anomalous position at Hong Kong. We Penal Law hair
- adequate terror and to when it is barely applicable
of those insoluble problems
their deres by
and got there in no perfecbility of enforcing Berliche Courts and Officers without a compromise of
Lonce are
bound to maintai
- sin some refuch aw
identical queclives
bali. I do not know how there
for this which
anflicting Sligations
The dilemma is between sulei- are to be reconciled
Chinese people
and
English bros
hams the Law of
administer, in d. Mit regnering.
China.
gow will
In 1862
Judge, to
ment of Chinese how but the employment of thenèse Agency only, that sin that case there is to be considered not merely the enforce =
fried reference to a similar questions
Isieron a fach to which planseble.
for the purpose. In theses of this hand
well. fo.ded
e raised
object
those whose
two
and
Victoria, Hongkong,
Received
March, 1845.
Lord Stanley.
Governor
5.24.
Explanatory of last clause of Ordinances No 10, of 18hh,
relating
an...
to punishment's
chinese, Jubjects.
MOB.
P
feent
ouch a people
thed among
&
effective restraint and a fornment not to be hifted with or disleged
an. object of such primary importance
that it is worth while to
becure
Even at the experice of adopting
it
a
policing the most offered to our oure
feelings and fechechicssions. Not.
havering how to suggest anything better I should not, if I had
the divisions, for it in farme of the rejections of these haws
See Wo. 1062
a froze
of) I affect to the necessitio
falttiripe wodumbs the provin referring wiha this pen uovial is rafue Bet nutys have practical mit dies it word be belle Shurch not to nettable with it helan 29/
Rece
Japen.
2 1061 Sthing 119. 139
Davis
1045
MR Stephen
WR Mindoch.
Forwarded JULY
Loid Stanley 18
Lin
ste
thore nipt of your despatch
thave tracknowledge 10 July
of the
which authorized
Ordinance 2010 of 1844, of that Clacene in the which ted to the actual
Explaining the motiver the 8 March last R024,
the
decided Wadopt
the course which
appear tost me godt to
which you have stated
The considerations
with Chinese unages.
penishments in conforming of theirene origin of infliction on Criminals
Juslinger
-
the Lucus Commands.
according nesived
in this matter. Shave
རྒྱའུ་པ་ཟལ་བ་ལ་འབའཐ/....༧
Fam
which flow out. have there to do with people for whom one
of a our anomalous position at Hong Kong. We Penal Law hair
- adequate terror and to when it is barely applicable
of those insoluble problems
their deres by
and got there in no perfecbility of enforcing Berliche Courts and Officers without a compromise of
Lonce are
bound to maintai
- sin some refuch aw
identical queclives
bali. I do not know how there
for this which
anflicting Sligations
The dilema is between sulei- are to be reconciled
Chinese people
and
English bros
hams the Law of
administer, in d. Mit regnering.
China.
gow will
In 1862
Judge, to
ment of Chinese how but the employment of thenèse Agency only, that sin that case there is to be considered not merely the enforce =
fried reference to a similar questions
Isieron a fach to which planseble.
for the purpose. In theses of this hand
well. fo.ded
e raised
object
those whose
two
and
Vistoria, Hongkong,
Received
March, 1845.
Love Stanley.
Governor
5.24.
Explanatory of last clause of Ordinances No 10, of 18hh,
relating
an...
to punishment's
chinese, Jubjects.
MOB.
P
feent
ouch a people
thed among
&
effective restraint and a fornment not to be hifted with or disleged
an.
object of such primary importance
that it is worth while to
becure
Even at the experice of adopting
it
a
policing the most offered to our oure
feelings and fechechicssions. Not.
havering how to suggest anything better I should not, if I had
the divisions, for it in farme of the rejections of these haws
See Wo. 1062
a froze
of) I affect to the necessitio
falttiripe wodumbs the provin referring wiha this pen uovial is rafue Bet nutys have practical mit dies it word be belle Shurch not to nettable with it helan 29/
Rece
Japen.
2 1061 Sthing 119. 139
Davis
1045
MR Stephen
WR Mindoch.
Forwarded JULY
Loid Stanley 18
Lin
ste
thore nipt of your despatch
thave tracknowledge 10 July
of the
which authorized
Ordinance 2010 of 1844, of that Clacene in the which ted to the actual
Explaining the motiver the 8 March last R024,
the
decided Wadopt
the course which
appear tost me godt to
which you have stated
The considerations
with Chinese unages.
penishments in conforming of theirene origin of infliction on Criminals
Juslinger
-
the Lucus Commands.
according nesived
in this matter. Shave
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.